Thursday 12 May 2016

The myth of "That which does not kill us, makes us stronger": a call for resilience development

“That which does not kill us, makes us stronger” – attributed to Nietzsche. Really? I would argue that whatever it is that may not kill us may end up shattering our self-esteem, destroying our hopes and dreams, ruining our careers and changing our lives forever. I would like to suggest: that which does not kill us can leave us suffering a living hell. The unnamed event which we survive may have a raft of effects and very much depends on the individual and I would suggest that at the heart of this is an individual’s resilience.

I am writing this having had a chat with Jo Higgins-Cezza who runs a consultancy business specialising in resilience training (www.resiliencematters.eu). I spent the afternoon thinking about resilience and teachers and reflecting on my own experience. Some of what I write here may be nonsense as it reflects only my experience, some of you may think that I’m being ageist whilst others may completely reject what I say.

It is worth saying that stress is the product of the way in which an individual handles pressure. Two individuals may be exposed to identical pressures, one may breeze through whilst the other may experience stress. I must emphasise that stress is a product of an individual and that it is personalised and real. Just because dealing with irate parents causes you no problem does not mean that the same is true of a colleague. Now going back to my chat, I believe that a key element in all of this is personal resilience, having a mindset which aids an individual to deal with pressure. Being less resilient is not a failing, in just the same way as being wheat-intolerant is not a failing, it is what it is. Unlike wheat-intolereance I do believe that lack of resilience can be worked upon.

This bit may annoy some of you and I may be wrong regarding the population of younger teachers but I am simply writing from experience. Over the last 10 or 15 years I have noticed that the least experienced teachers and trainee teachers appear to be less resilience than those before them. I remember being thrown into the maelstrom of an inner-city comp along with a bunch of other novices and we all floated. As a school leader I have encountered younger teachers over the last 10 years struggling to cope with pressures that my contemporaries had taken in their stride. Here’s my theory (which may be rubbish). Since the birth of the National Curriculum, SATs, OFSTED and league towers the pressures on schools have grown to the extent that teachers place less pressure on children to succeed as a result of their own actions. What I mean is that 25 years ago if I messed up my A-levels it was my fault, plain and simply. Now however the pendulum has swung to a point where the fault is seen to lie with teachers and schools. Teachers have worked hard to insulate their children from failure, they constantly reinforce positives and have done their best to make sure children succeed. The responsibility for success has shifted from pupil to teacher since results have become such a high stakes game. The result is that young people have not experienced enough failure, they lack resilience, they have become porcelain tea-cups that if tapped, they crack.

This generation have now reached an age where they are themselves teachers and I routinely see them struggle coping with pressures that their predecessors handled more effectively. This is not the fault of these teachers and so must not be seen as a negative character trait, I believe that those entering teaching now are simply a product of an over-protective education system (and generation of parents) that discourage resilience.

We must protect these teachers. We must develop these teachers. Just because they may not possess the resilience that others do does not mean they are poor teachers or that they do not have the potential to be future school leaders. This is not a Darwinian nightmare in which only the fittest should be allowed to survive. But we can’t simply put sticking plasters over the problem. We can’t simply make every experience for them positive. As teachers they (we) need to fail, they need to struggle but they also need to learn how to cope. In short we must make our teachers more resilient.

So what should we do? We must start by recognising the issue. We must articulate the problem and recognise that doing nothing is not an option if we want to retain teachers, maintain standards and develop future leaders. There needs to be a change in mindset of teachers of my generation; just because I coped with rioting Year 10s 20-odd years ago (as a new teacher) doesn’t mean that my new teachers should be able to; their educational experience has failed them and they simply may not be resilient enough at the moment. We need to care for each other and act as mentors and counsellors for our colleagues. It is in the interest of all teachers to retain good teachers and not just school leadership so we should all help out. However those vulnerable teachers need to do something themselves. They must share their worries, they must reflect on their practice, they must be willing to learn. I have found that through adopting a reflective-practice approach throughout my career has allowed me to cope with lots of difficulties and ensure that they have been learning experiences.

Schools would be wise to recognise that resilience is a key issue in the emotional well-being of their staff. Maybe then Nietzsche has a chance of being right.

No comments:

Post a Comment